The U.S. economy keeps expanding, yet a growing share of American households report they cannot keep up with basic costs. Federal Reserve survey data, Census Bureau tracking, and consumer spending figures all point to the same split: aggregate growth masks a widening gap between those riding the boom and those absorbing its costs. The tension has a name in policy circles, the “boomcession,” and it is reshaping how people vote, spend, and plan for the future.
The Numbers Behind the Squeeze
The Federal Reserve fielded its Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking from October 18 to 31, 2024, capturing how adults across income levels, races, and education brackets experienced the economy in real time. The SHED results break down emergency-expense readiness, debt burdens, and housing affordability by demographic group, and the picture they draw is sharply uneven. While top-line figures show most adults say they are doing at least okay financially, the detail tables reveal that lower-income respondents and those with disabilities face steeper barriers to covering unexpected bills or keeping up with rent. The share of adults able to cover a modest emergency with cash or its equivalent has slipped from its pandemic-era peak, and reliance on high-cost credit is more common among those already on the financial edge.
Census Bureau data reinforces that pattern. A government analysis of post-tax income trends through 2024 shows that the 90/10 inequality ratio, which compares earnings at the top and bottom of the distribution, has grown since 2009. The tax system narrows pre-tax gaps, but the remaining spread is large enough to explain why median households feel stalled even as national output climbs. Complementing that snapshot, the Census Bureau’s high-frequency Household Pulse survey has repeatedly found elevated levels of anxiety about paying usual expenses, with food, rent, and utilities ranking as the most common stress points. Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer expenditure reports for 2024 confirm the divide from the spending side: income bounds defining each quintile show that the highest earners increased outlays while the lowest quintile faced tighter budgets, cutting back on discretionary categories even as they devoted a larger share of income to necessities. The OECD’s 2025 Employment Outlook adds an international lens, noting that the U.S. federal minimum wage has been unchanged since 2009 and that its real value continues to fall, a dynamic with few parallels among peer economies and one that leaves many low-wage workers struggling to keep pace with rent and food prices.
Perception, Politics, and the Affordability Gap
Hard data on inequality aligns with what Americans say they feel. A survey by Pew found a growing share of adults expect their personal finances to deteriorate over the coming year, with the pessimism concentrated among lower earners and those without college degrees. Many respondents cited prices for groceries, housing, and insurance as the main reasons they anticipated falling behind, even if their wages had risen. A separate Pew survey published in October 2025 showed that most adults still rate economic conditions poorly, with the partisan gap in those assessments widening since a January 2024 baseline. Republicans and Democrats increasingly interpret the same price tags and paychecks through different political lenses, but both camps register broad concern about affordability, suggesting that cost-of-living pressures have become a rare point of cross-partisan overlap even amid polarized debates about their causes.
That disconnect between macro strength and household strain has turned “affordability” into the dominant word in political campaigns. The Washington Post reported that the term was being used roughly 70 times a month in political messaging, a frequency that signals how central cost-of-living pressure has become to electoral strategy and stump speeches. Candidates now frame proposals on housing, health care, and energy not just as social policy but as direct responses to grocery bills and rent checks, reflecting focus-group evidence that voters prioritize day-to-day expenses over abstract growth metrics. Business anecdotes echo the same story. The Federal Reserve’s January 2026 Beige Book, compiled from business and community contacts across all 12 Federal Reserve Districts with information gathered on or before January 5, 2026, described price-sensitive consumers pulling back on discretionary purchases and trading down to cheaper brands. The Financial Times reported that McDonald’s acknowledged poorer customers were eating less of its food, quantifying traffic declines among lower-income diners as value menus failed to fully offset the cumulative effect of higher prices. Together, these signals suggest that even as the boom continues on paper, a growing slice of the country is living something closer to a rolling recession, one in which the central political question is no longer whether the economy is growing, but who can afford to live in it.
More From The Daily Overview
*This article was researched with the help of AI, with human editors creating the final content.
Grant Mercer covers market dynamics, business trends, and the economic forces driving growth across industries. His analysis connects macro movements with real-world implications for investors, entrepreneurs, and professionals. Through his work at The Daily Overview, Grant helps readers understand how markets function and where opportunities may emerge.
