Retiring at 65 is no longer a simple question of hitting a single “magic number.” The minimum savings you need now varies dramatically by state, with the gap between the cheapest and most expensive places running into seven figures. New analysis of state-by-state costs shows that in some parts of the country, particularly Hawaii, a comfortable retirement can require well over $2 million in savings, while lower cost states demand far less.
Those differences are driven by everyday expenses, from housing and groceries to health care and long term care. I will walk through how researchers arrive at these minimum savings targets, why Hawaii and a handful of coastal states sit at the top of the range, and how lower cost states like Oklahoma reshape the retirement math.
How analysts calculate a “minimum” nest egg at 65
To pin down a baseline savings target, recent research starts with what it costs a typical older household to cover essentials in each state, then layers in Social Security and a sustainable withdrawal rate. One widely cited breakdown looks at the annual cost of living for retirees and then backs into the savings needed so that a 65 year old can draw roughly 4 percent a year without running out of money. In that framework, a state with an annual cost of living of $56,947 translates into required savings of $850,469, while another with slightly higher annual expenses of $59,835 requires $862,756 in savings, figures that are explicitly tied to $850,469, $56,947 and $862,756.
The same analysis emphasizes that these numbers are not about luxury living, but about covering the same basic costs in every state, from rent or property taxes to utilities and food. It is presented as a practical benchmark for someone who wants to stop full time work at 65 and maintain a modest standard of living, not a high end lifestyle. The author, Mike Winters, frames the estimates as a starting point for planning rather than a rigid rule, but the methodology is consistent across states, which makes the comparisons meaningful.
Earlier work on the same question reached a similar conclusion about the spread between states, but highlighted just how extreme the top of the range has become. In Hawaii, one analysis found that you need around $2.21 million to retire at 65 and cover essential living expenses, with the figure cited both as $2.21 m and as $2.21 million. That estimate assumes a basic lifestyle and explicitly warns that lifestyle changes or unexpected expenses could push the required savings even higher, which is why planners treat these state tables as minimums rather than comfortable targets.
Hawaii’s $2M-plus price tag and how other states compare
Hawaii consistently emerges as the most expensive place in the country to stop working, and the latest state by state comparisons underline just how far it sits from the national norm. A detailed breakdown of annual expenditures after Social Security shows that Hawaii requires savings of $2,212,084 to support retirement, with annual spending needs of $110,921, of which $22,523.40 is covered by Social Security and $88,483 must come from personal savings. Those figures line up with the separate estimate that in Hawaii you need around $2.21 m to retire at 65, reinforcing the idea that the state’s combination of high housing, food and transportation costs pushes the minimum nest egg above $2 million.
Other high cost states cluster well below Hawaii but still demand seven figure balances. The same annual expenditures table lists Massachusetts with required savings of $1,645,764 and annual spending of $88,6xx (rounded in the source), again net of Social Security. Coastal states like California and New York also sit near the top of the rankings in multiple cost of living comparisons, reflecting expensive metro areas like Los Angeles, San Francisco and New York City that drive up housing and health care costs for retirees.
Even outside the continental United States, the pattern holds. High cost, geographically isolated states such as Alaska and jurisdictions like Washington D.C. tend to show elevated retirement costs because imported goods, specialized medical care and urban housing all carry a premium. By contrast, states with more moderate housing markets, such as Maryland, can look relatively affordable even when they border expensive coastal hubs, which is why many near retirees consider relocating across state lines rather than uprooting to a different region entirely.
Cheaper states, tax breaks and what savers actually have
On the other end of the spectrum, lower cost states dramatically reduce the savings hurdle. A recent set of Key Findings highlights Oklahoma as the lowest cost state in the list, with a cost of living index of 84.4, well below the national average. In that same analysis, the typical minimum savings needed in the cheapest states falls between $735,000 and $810,000, a range that is still substantial but far from the $2 million plus required in Hawaii. That gap helps explain why some retirees are willing to trade coastal amenities for lower housing and health care bills in the interior of the country.
More From TheDailyOverview
Nathaniel Cross focuses on retirement planning, employer benefits, and long-term income security. His writing covers pensions, social programs, investment vehicles, and strategies designed to protect financial independence later in life. At The Daily Overview, Nathaniel provides practical insight to help readers plan with confidence and foresight.
